logo dA mini  commented sentence


Denial of shared custody and care of a dog in the Sentence by the Judge of District Court no. 40 of Madrid

2013.08.10

AUTHOR: Ana Sanz Rojas, attorney for the defendant and member of ABA Abogadas (ABA Attorneys), specialists in family, labor and civil law.
TITLE: Denial of shared custody and care of a dog in the Sentence by the Judge of District Court no. 40 of Madrid.


PLACE OF PUBLICATION: dA webCenter, August 2013.
DATE OF PUBLICATION: August 2013.
Internal Link: Sentence

SUMMARY

On March 12, 2013, the Judge of District Court no. 40 of Madrid dictated the Sentence in which my defendant maintains exclusive ownership of her dog, without any obligation to provide shared custody with her ex–partner as requested by the complainant. In the test practiced within the proceeding it was possible to demonstrate that my client was the sole owner of the animal, having received the dog as gift from a family member, and that the chip and other documentation regarding to the dog was in her name. The legal foundation is based on the concept that property is considered a private good (article 1.346 of the Civil Code).

-
Facebook! Twitter Del.icio.us! Google! Live! Yahoo!


« back